House v. NCAA Case Updates – FMJ Law Podcast Episode 31

Nate Snyder, Adam Brown, and our intrepid law clerk, Erick Kriewaldt, analyze the House v. NCAA case, which is groundbreaking litigation in the NIL and college sports arena. The team talks about the settlement hearing and the concerns raised by the judge, potential future litigation, testimony raised, the complexities of the case itself and the classes of clients involved, including former college athletes, and the impact the settlement could have on future college athletes. Nate, Erick, and Adam also talk about the $20.5 million cap per school, roster caps, potential Title IX issues (that are not being addressed right now), backpay for former athletes, antitrust issues, the transfer portal, Dr. Evil, Rudy, and more! Make sure to stretch, and get ready for this college sports episode of the FMJ Law Podcast.

Please click below to listen to Episode 31, or you can find us on most major podcast platforms.


The information in this podcast is for informational purposes only. It is not intended to be legal advice, nor does it establish an attorney-client relationship. If anything, this podcast should be considered advertising for the types of service we can provide. Legal advice of any nature should be sought from legal counsel directly. Unsolicited messages to Fafinski Mark & Johnson will not be considered confidential and do not create an attorney-client relationship with FMJ or any of our attorneys, and we may not respond at all.

Related Attorneys

Nathan R. Snyder
Adam J. Brown